TL;DR: Both Prudence's message and Ra's Law of One teachings align on many core principles, such as unity, love, and spiritual evolution. However, there is one major contradiction—how reincarnation works. Ra describes it as a linear evolutionary process through densities, while Prudence suggests that linear reincarnation is a deception. I seek clarification from Prudence and/or his contacts on this fundamental difference.
First I'd like to apologies for the lengthy post, I just wanted to make sure I have adequate context for the audience and Prudence before I state the questions for Prudence and/or his contacts. Many of us who've been drawn to this community, resonate deeply with Prudence's message because they nearly compliment everything that came from the Ra contact between 1981-1984. For those who don't know, a group of 3 people known as the LL Research group, consisting of Don Elkins, Carla Rueckert and Jim McCarthy made contact with a collective known as Ra, the same Ra that was distorted into Egyptian mythology (Much like any other highly evolved beings who've walked this Earth to impart wisdom was distorted, like Jesus for example.) Ra wanting to correct this distortion seeked this group because of their vibratory nature and they began channeling this collective through Carla. Don was the questioner, and Jim provided assistance to Carla as she was under a trans state, and he also served as the scribe who wrote down all the questions and answers that eventually became the books. I woke up to the realization that we are all one last year. I had heard of the Law of One early in my awakening, but I only began reading it around the same time Prudence made his first Reddit post a couple of months ago—an interesting synchronicity to say the least. I'm nearly done the entire collection, (at 93rd session out of 106). The format of the book are in questions and answers. Ra only responded to questions Don would ask, and they would never volunteer information as well as any information that would infringe upon free will or as they call "the law of confusion". To summarize the Law of one: "I am Ra. The Law of One, though beyond the limitations of name, as you call vibratory sound complexes, may be approximated by stating that all things are one, that there is no polarity, no right or wrong, no disharmony, but only identity. All is one, and that one is love/light, light/love, the Infinite Creator." So far from reading mostly everything on this website and almost the entire Law of One books, when you assume different terminology mean the same thing, for example the GCS = One infinite creator, we can see why so many of us would be drawn to Prudence's words because both Ra and Prudence and his contacts speak nearly the same truth. Both speak of the coming apotheosis, both speak about negative entities manipulating our civilization, Prudence calls them "the not-so-good-group" and Ra calls them the Orion Group. The Orion group is also not just one species but a collective or dark federation if you will, of multiple species who's dedicated themselves to service to self(STS) and are hell bent on manipulation, conquest and enslavement. They also don't specify which species, however it's implied that the species is irrelevant because each species will have members who are polarized towards good and others who are polarized towards evil, in other words, you could have a good Nordic working for the federation and an evil Nordic working for the Orion Group, or the not-so-good ETs. Both also speak of a Federation of good ETs who attempts to protect this planet without infringing on free will as much as possible, of which Ra says to be a member of. So far mostly everything checks out, which is why I find myself cautiously trusting both sources. However, I have found one glaring contradiction between the two, which is causing a lot of confliction within me to figure out which is the truth. I, like Prudence, care only about the truth, I seek truth above comfort. In the Q&A Part 9 https://www.jrprudence.com/post/conversation-with-damien-q-a-part-9-unstoppable-wins-continued-success, Prudence says: "Pay attention to hoaxers, gurus, frauds and teachers and their teachings that speak of reincarnation in a linear fashion that requires X amount of time and only after B amount of years, can one free themselves. This is not only untrue, but a part of the not-so-good forces plan to capture unknowing souls and those prone to both mysticism and logicality. Yes, there are persons engineered on both ET sides as “players” or “ground agents.” Some for the not so-good. Others, like me, for 3-3-3 (Good.)" Then there was the just released Message from Above VII today, which Mantis said: "This is the case with interdimensional realme-criminals who are well aware that it is a “choice” to shift dimensions [and not to be bound by the lie of linear reincarnation], and can, at will – instead of relying on death/reincarnation – “change forms” into “earth human avatars.”" This contradiction is critical because, if Prudence’s information is correct, then Ra’s description of reincarnation would be a deception—potentially making Ra part of the manipulation rather than a liberating force.
According to Ra, reincarnation is a structured evolutionary process where souls gradually evolve through densities. Each major cycle lasts 75,000 years, divided into three 25,000-year minor cycles. At the end of each cycle, there is an opportunity for “harvest” or “graduation” into a higher density, depending on a soul’s level of evolution. (To be clear, the word 'harvest' does not mean growing souls for food, the context in which they use it, is the same as graduating to the next level, or as Prudence's contact refers as 'Apotheosis'). If a soul is not yet ready, it continues reincarnating in third density until it meets the minimum threshold of 51% Service to others (STO) for positive harvest. And for further clarity, a soul is not obligated to reincarnate back on Earth specifically, it can reincarnate on any planet that is currently in third density. So long as the planet matches the vibratory level of that soul's evolution.
However, Prudence’s contact states that linear reincarnation is a lie, implying that this entire evolutionary framework is false or manipulated by negative forces. This suggests that Ra is either:
Part of the deception, knowingly or unknowingly reinforcing the reincarnation trap narrative.
Accurately describing universal mechanics, while Prudence’s contact is either misinformed or intentionally misleading people about how soul evolution actually works.
This means one of these sources is either incomplete, incorrect, or intentionally deceiving us. This contradiction has been tearing at me since last night because I don't know who to believe. Both of them advocate for love and kindness, both of them advocate for seeking truth and the divinity within themselves, both of the core message is the same and frankly both are incredibly uplifting and empowering. And both speak of manipulation from darker forces. Prudence, since I know you've not personally read the law of one, I'd like for you to ask some questions to your contacts if you don't personally know the answer, if that's ok with you? Much love, for taking the time in your busy schedule to answer these.
What exactly does your contact mean by “linear reincarnation” being a lie? If Ra is incorrect about the 75,000-year reincarnation cycle, what is the true structure of soul evolution? If reincarnation is a trap, what was originally intended instead?
Are your contacts aware of the Ra Collective? If so, what is their opinion of Ra? Do they consider them allies or part of the manipulation? If Ra is misleading people, what is their agenda?
Are the density system described by Ra accurate? Whereas there are 7 major densities (not to be confused with the word "dimension"), with each density having 7-sub densities that spiral upwards towards the infinite creator or (GCS in your terms), and the octave (8th density) is reintegration within the source/gcs/infinite creator. If so, is humanity shifting from the 3rd Density into the 4th as we speak?
Is there a middle ground where both your contact and Ra are both correct but there's some nuance that's lacking from both your current information you've shared and those of Ra in regards to soul evolution and reincarnation? (The first question might answer this question)
Ra says that the Veil of forgetfullness or the reason why we forget when we incarnate is to give us free will, is this your understanding as well?
Do your contact know of the Orion Group that Ra speaks about?
I once again want to thank you for taking the time to read through this. Love and light to you and your contact <3
Something that gets missed by 99% of people who read the Ra Material (and any channeled material) is that it is not an entity speaking through someone
Channeling is essentially frequency alignment to “match up” between channel and entity, but really everything you hear come out of the instruments mouth is their own imaginative interpretation of the concepts being conveyed
What does this mean? That there is no objective truth in any channeled material ever. It is always lensed through the human doing the channeling
With the Ra Material, this unfortunately gets hit twofold;
One, the questioner often asked irrelevant or improper questions/forms of questions that generate transient or “junk” information, and Ra explicitly would not step “out of bounds” in answering as to preserve free will choice
Two, Carla was extremely Christian. And so every concept got lensed through that belief system
The Ra Material is invaluable, and contains a LOT of truths, but requires extremely heavy discernment and understanding that it is NOT Ra speaking, but Carla imaginatively interpreting frequency concepts and attempting to convey them. No matter how “pure” a channel, this is always the case for material such as this
I love the Ra Material, I have personal experiences confirming it is legitimate, but those same experiences also confirm that it is possibly the most misinterpreted spiritual text around the concept because people think “this is pure” and turn off their discernment, and then latch onto concepts, numbers, evaluations etc. that are really not “real” or “objective” but are allegorical tools from the imagination attempting to convey a concept.
Such as the density system. Ra even clarifies multiple times that the numbering and ordering is largely incorrect and irrelevant, but that it is being used for simplicity of conceptualization between instrument and questioner. But, people like strict “this is how it is” and so take things too literally, stopping their own discernment, and believing in metaphor and poetry as if it’s a mechanical description of reality.